I agree with Ray. I have lately browsed quite a few curriculum documents from other countries (especially those that have done well on the international PISA scales) and they use REAL WORDS to describe their outcomes or competences, not code. I want to teach e.g. 'interpreting graphs', not LO1: AS2.2;2.3;2.4. It wastes time. These ASs are not even numbered in our curriculum statements (only bulleted) and we have different numbering systems in the different EMDCs.
Of course, Mafika, you are right. The content of the 'codes' is real teaching.